Qm2 -- Quality Management to a Higher Power

Home

Nonprofit Boards

Especially for Museums

Executive Leadership

Management

Strategic Planning

Fund Raising

Learning Organizations

Meetings/Teamwork

Employees

Finances/Budgeting

Marketing

Management Briefings

Book Reviews



Consulting Services

Contact Us

SEARCH






Go Back to Previous Page


Meeting Evaluation Instructions
by

Everyone in the museum world has too much to do! Spending time in meetings that do not work is frustrating and abuses your time. Since meetings constitute a major technique for working together, we can't eliminate them but we can fix them. This simple evaluation will help. Use it at your next meeting.

Two Agendas:

All meetings have two agendas. The first, familiar agenda is the content that includes the issues, decisions, and information that stem from the purpose of the meeting. The second is the process agenda that includes all the ways meetings are structured, how people interact and create the meeting climate. Poor process creates ineffective, time wasting, frustrating meetings.

The Problem With Meetings:

Normally, everyone complains about meetings before or after they occur. People rarely speak up in the meeting to identify poor process and improve it. The problem with meetings is that too few participants speak up to improve them. Here's how to do it:

If You Are in Charge of the Meeting:

  1. Read the twenty-one evaluative statements to confirm that they cover the process issues your meetings face. Rewrite the evaluation if you must, but don't fail to evaluate regularly.

  2. Tell those who attend meetings you chair that you want to improve meetings and that you intend to end each meeting by evaluating it.

  3. Pass the evaluation out at the beginning of the meeting, discuss it briefly.

  4. Assign someone in the meeting to remind you to take time before the meeting is over to complete the evaluation. Have this person collect the evaluations, summarize the rating on a fresh evaluation and share the evaluation before the next meeting.

  5. Discuss the evaluation at the beginning of the next meeting, particularly if it will help you understand the data better.

  6. Identify two or three to improve. Post the items in the meeting room as ground rules or goals so they will remind everyone.

  7. Reevaluate every three to five meetings to assess progress and identify new areas to improve.

If you are not in charge of the meeting:

Influence the chair to use an evaluation OR copy the evaluation and leave it in meeting room.

More ideas:

If the meeting is more than two hours long, try using the evaluation at the half way point to improve the meeting before it ends. Have meeting participants individually choose the one thing that could improve the meeting. Accumulate these ideas publicly, decide which areas to work toward improving. Encourage the others to evaluate their meetings. Try it at a board or committee meeting.

Meeting Evaluation

Check the box that most clearly represents your perception of this meeting. Feel free to add comments to clarify your responses.

SA = Strongly Agree  A = Agree  U = Uncertain  D = Disagree SD = Strongly Disagree

1 The agenda of this meeting is clear and relevant. SA A U D SD
2 The people needed to address the agenda were present. SA A U D SD
3 I was appropriately informed of the meeting's time and place. SA A U D SD
4 Appropriate material to read was sent in advance. SA A U D SD
5 People come to this meeting well prepared. SA A U D SD
6 Issues of concern to me get on the agenda. SA A U D SD
7 We deal constructively with the issues. SA A U D SD
8 We consider the impact of this team's work on others. SA A U D SD
9 I understand the rationale for decisions made in this meeting. SA A U D SD
10 Responsibilities and deadlines are clearly decided and assigned. SA A U D SD
11 Decisions from this meeting are well implemented. SA A U D SD
12 People are held accountable for decisions and assignments. SA A U D SD
13 The results of this meeting are well communicated to others. SA A U D SD
14 The meeting was well structured; beginning, middle, and end. SA A U D SD
15 The meeting started and ended on time. SA A U D SD
16 The meeting stayed on agenda and did not drift or bog down. SA A U D SD
17 Overall this team is operating very well. SA A U D SD
18 We have honest and constructive dialoge in this meeting. SA A U D SD
19 This meeting was a model of our desired culture. SA A U D SD
20 We meet often enough and for the right length of time. SA A U D SD
21 This evaluation is used to improve our meetings. SA A U D SD

©Qm² 1998. All rights reserved. Taken from the forthcoming manual: Managing Museum Meetings: A Revolutionary Guide to Improve Your Meetings by Will Phillips. All museums are granted permission to reproduce the evaluation and instructions for internal use.

Go Back to Previous Page

TOPVisit Qm².com—Our Site for CorporationsCopyright © 1998–2004